• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Gender and Power Metrics

Gender and Power MetricsGender and Power Metrics

A living database of scales and indicators that have been used to measure constructs of gender, agency, power, and control.

  • Search the Database

Personal Attribute Questionnaire (PAQ)

  • Overview
  • Contraception

Overview

Type: Personal adherence to gender roles

Citation: Gage EA. Gender attitudes and sexual behaviors: Comparing center and marginal athletes and nonathletes in a collegiate setting. Violence Against Women. 2008; 14(2): 1014-1032.

Use of Scale: Measure

Level of Generality: Individual

# of Items Reported: 24

Availability: Partial

Theme: Gender/social norms, SRH/HIV

Demographics

Region: North America

Country: USA

Gender: Male

Urban / Rural: nr

Ethnicity: NR

Age Group: Can't tell

Age Range: Mean age: 21.95 for nonathlete, 20.35 for marginal sport, 20.18 for center sport

Scale Information

# of Subscales: 3

Subscale Name(s): Masculinity (M); Femininity (F); Masuclinity-Femininity (M-F)

Direction and Meaning:

Response Range: 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 (indicating highest identification with femininity for F scale and masculinity for the M and M-F scales)

Internal Consistency: NA

Internal Consistency by Subgroup: NA

Test-retest Reliability: NA

Sample Items: Masculinity: "Not at all independent, Very independent"; Femininity: "Not at all emotional, Very emotional"; Masculinity-Femininity: "Not at all aggressive, Very aggressive"

Measured Outcome(s): Contraception

Outcome(s)

Contraceptive use frequency

Detailed Outcome(s) Description

How often do you use contraception when having sex? (Every time, almost every time, about half of the time, less than half of the time, never, I do not have sex)

Statistical Method (Most Adjusted)

Linear regression

Reference group for gender indicator

Higher vs. lower masculinity; higher vs. lower femininity; higher vs lower polar dimensions of gender

Detailed Results

Masculinity scores, femininity scores, and polar dimensions of gender scores were not significantly associated with rates of contraceptive use.

Summary

Summary association oriented to reflect the following relationships: Positive association: indicates more equitable views or division of power and greater contraceptive use or more inequitable views/division of power and lower contraceptive use; Inverse association: reflects more equitable gender views/division of power and lower contraceptive use.

No association

Covariates

Age, number of sisters, number of brothers, race, religious service attendance, class year, fraternity involvement, mother's education, father's education, sport team embeddedness, type of sport played

We want to hear from you – let us know of any errors or submit your validation or measurement study for inclusion. Email Us.

  • About
  • Index of Scales
  • Appendix
USAID

The Evidence Project is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of cooperative agreement no. AID-OAA-A-13-00087. The contents of this web site are the sole responsibility of the Evidence Project and Population Council and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.

Evidence Project

The Evidence Project seeks to expand access to high quality family planning/reproductive health services worldwide through implementation science, including the strategic generation, translation, and use of new and existing evidence. The project is led by the Population Council.

This website is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the Population Council and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.

© 2019 The Population Council, Inc.